Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42827 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2015 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. PAPPU YADAV @ PAPPU KUMAR Son of Kamleshwari Yadav, Resident of Village - Begulaha, Meghu Tola, P.S. - Raniganj, District - Arari.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.42839 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2015 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Munna Yadav @ Munna Kumar, Son of Kalanand Yadav, Resident of Village - Sarwaha Barbana, P.S. - Raniganj, District - Araria.

2. Kumod Yadav @ Kumod Kumar, Son of Kalanand Yadav, Resident of Village - Sarwaha Barbana,P.S. - Raniganj, District - Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.42827 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Priyadarshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Kumar Uday Pratap (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.42839 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Priyadarshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kr.Uday Pratap (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42827 of 2015 (2) dt.14-10-2015 State.

The petitioners being the maternal brother and younger brother of the husband of the victim are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is of killing the daughter of the informant after one year of the marriage for non fulfillment of dowry demand.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the accusation is omnibus and general. The post-mortem reflects no external injury. The cause of death has not been ascertained by the Doctor as a result the viscera has been preserved. Though, it is alleged in the First Information Report that the daughter of the informant was throttled to death. Accusation is not specific against the petitioners.

Considering the thrust of accusation against the husband of the victim, who, is in custody and accusation is not being corroborated with the medical opinion, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42827 of 2015 (2) dt.14-10-2015 Magistrate, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 58 of 2015, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T