Om Prakash Rai @ Om Prakash And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46707 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -95 Year- 2013 Thana -PARSA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Om Prakash Rai @ Om Prakash, son of late Shyam Nand Rai

2. Rita Devi, wife of Om Prakash Rai Both residents of village- Anyay, P.S. Parsa, District Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey, Adv. For the State : Mr. Pramod Kr. Panday,(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the Petitioners are the brother-inlaw and wife of the deceased and claim to have been living separately, let the Petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 95 of 2013, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46707 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015 2/2 of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T