Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52396 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2018 Thana- ASARGANJ District- Munger ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav, aged about 32 years, Male, Son of late Chandra Yadav, residents of Chaurgaw (Purshottampur), P.S. Asarganj, District, Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kamal Kishore Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 302, 307, 324, 323, 147 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1, giving liberty to renew his prayer after one year in jail custody.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 30.07.2018, i.e, more than one year.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52396 of 2019(2) dt.28-08-2019 2/2 case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No.256 of 2018 arising out of Asarganj P.S. Case No. 34 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T