Mantu Kahar @ Mantu Samir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54961 of 2019 Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-288 Year-2017 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Mantu Kahar @ Mantu Samir Son of Ganesh Prasad Resident of Village - Anand Nagar, P.S.- Ara Town, Distt - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the case diary.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Bikramganj P.S.Case No.288 of 2017 registered for an offence under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the IPC as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged by the Chaukidar, Suresh Singh against unknown persons regarding two dead bodies which were thrown in a lonely place. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during course of investigation, the name of the petitioner has been transpired and only the allegation against this petitioner is that he was last seen with the victim. Save and except suspicion, there is no material
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54961 of 2019(4) dt.25-10-2019 2/2 against the petitioner to connect the alleged offence. Petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S.Case No.288 of 2017 with following conditions:- (i) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T