Anjani Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1132 of 2014 ====================================================== Anjani Kumar Mishra S/o Late Banke Bihari Sharma, Resident of VillageMahamadpur, P.O.+P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jehanabad at Present-Khajpura, P.S.-Hawai Adda, P.O.-Bihar Veternay College, Patna-14, District-Patna (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary.

2. The Director General of Police, Patna, Bihar.

3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Patna.

5. The City Superintendent of Police, Patna.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad

7. The Thana Adhyaksh of Hawai Adda Police Station, Patna.

8. The Thana Adhyaksh of Dhanrua P.S.-Patna.

9. The Thana Adhyaksh of Ghoshi Police Station, Jehanabad.

10. Yugal Kishore Mochi @ Vyas, aged about 40 years, Son of Late Sakal Mochi.

11. Birendra Mochi, Son of Mukhlal Mochi. Both Resident of VillageKarhara, P.O.+P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG-2 on behalf of the State.

A counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of respondents no. 2 to 5, 7 and 8. Let the same be kept on record.

The petitioner has moved the Court basically for a direction that proper F.I.R. should be lodged in the case and investigated by the police or C.I.D. of the State or any Agency and for bringing the culprits to book and to punish

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1132 of 2014 (3) dt.13-07-2015 2/2 them. It appears that in the instant case the authorities have lodged F.I.R. being Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 283 of 2014 which has also been investigated and chargesheet submitted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation has not been proper and thus justice has not been done to the petitioner. However, in view of the fact that pursuant to a substantive F.I.R. and investigation, a formal chargesheeet has also been submitted before the Court, he agrees that he shall move before the Court concerned by filing an appropriate application in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances.

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to move before the Court concerned for redressal of his grievances. If such a petition is filed, the Court concerned shall take appropriate action and pass necessary orders after hearing the parties. The application stands disposed off with the aforesaid observations.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T