← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13049/2025disposed

Md. Manower Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13049 of 2025 ====================================================== Md. Manower Hussain Son of Md. Mazhar Hussain, resident of VillageMadhepur Tola Bagdob, P.S.-Balrampur, District-Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Director Panchayat Raj, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Purnea.

5.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Purnea.

6.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Baisi, District-Purnea. 7.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Baisi, District-Purnea. 8.

The Circle Officer, Baisi, District-Purnea.

9.

The Block Development Officer, Baisi, District-Purnea. 10.

The Block Panchayat Raj Officer, Baisi, District-Purnea. 11.

The Executive Engineer, Building Division, Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sumant Kr. Singh, AC to GA2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ application has been filed for issuance of mandamus to consider the representation of the petitioner with regard to construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan which was situated in Gram Panchayat- Sugwa, Mahanandpur, Block-Baisi, Purnea.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13049 of 2025(2) dt.19-08-2025 2/2

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed representation vide Annexure-P/3 of the writ petition, but no decision has been taken on his representation till date.

4. Counsel for the State submits that from annexureP/3, it transpires that this representation has been filed on 19.07.2025 and petitioner has come before this Hon'ble Court on 12.08.2025. He further submits that the Government has already fixed standard norm for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan throughout the district.

5. In this background, the present writ application is hereby disposed of directing the District Magistrate, Purnea (respondent No.4) to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation (annexure-P/3) already filed by the petitioner in the light of norms fixed by the State for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan within 90 days from the date of production of this order.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U