Rajesh Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28761 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -272 Year- 2017 Thana -MAJHAHGARH District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Rajesh Bhagat, Son of Dwarika Bhagat, Resident of Village- Koini, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Manjhagarh P.S.Case No.272 of 2017 registered for an offence under Sections 379, 328, 396, 412, 413 and 120B of the IPC. It has been submitted that in course of investigation one Vira Chaudhary @ Virbhadra Raut @ Bir Bahadur Rawat was apprehended who confessed his complicity in the above crime and disclosed the name of this petitioner and other co-accused. The said Vira Chaudhary @ Virbhadra Raut @ Bir Bahadur Rawat and Sanjay Bhagat have been allowed bail by a coordinate Benches of this Court in Cr.Misc.Nos.27174 of 2018 and 15629 of 2018. The petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2017 having clean antecedent
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28761 of 2018 (4) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 except one case and counter case between the family members relating to land dispute in which he is on bail. The learned APP opposed the submissions.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S.Case No.272 of 2017 with following condition:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T