Prabhash Yadav @ Prabhash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25304 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -170 Year- 2015 Thana -SINGHESHWARASHTHAN DistrictMADHEPURA ====================================================== Prabhash Yadav @ Prabhash Kumar, son of Lalo Yadav, resident of Village- Kabiyahi, P.S.- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 02.05.2016 passed in Cr Misc. No. 7825 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 14.11.2015, only on suspicion he has been implicated, there is no specific allegation against him, further specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Munna Kumar, the witnesses have not stated that as to how they claimed to identify the petitioner with specific name and address and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the trial is in progress

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25304 of 2018 (3) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 which is likely to be concluded.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 34 of 2016 arising out of Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 170 of 2015 pending in the court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura.

However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within four months, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T