Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57117/2022rejected

Dhiru Yadav @ Dhanukdhari Yadav @ Dhiraj Yadav @ Dhanush Dhiraj @ Dhanuk v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-04Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57117 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2015 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== DHIRU YADAV @ DHANUKDHARI YADAV @ DHIRAJ YADAV @ DHANUSH DHIRAJ @ DHANUK S/o Bangali Yadav Resident of Village - Bankar Paharpur, P.s. - amas, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the state.

The instance application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015 instituted for the offence u/s 302, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, section 17 of C.L.A. Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Earlier the application for regular bail of the petitioner was twice rejected by order dated 17.3.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 77797 of 2019 and vide order dt. 28.1.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19911 of 2021.

In pursuance to the direction of this Court, a report with regard to the present stage of trial has been received by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57117 of 2022(3) dt.04-09-2023 2/2 which it appears that the case was committed to the Sessions Court, Sherghati, Gaya.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.6.2019 and trial shall not be concluded in near future. Learned APP appearing for the state has submitted that the petitioner is a notorious person who has got 18 criminal antecedents.

No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail application of the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of nine months as the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.6.2019, failing which, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T