Lalu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62597 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62597 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -103 Year- 2017 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Lalu Yadav S/o Kamta Yadav, R/o Village- Kohra, Tola-Domna Bigha, P.S.- Makhdumpur in the District of Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navin Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Makhdumpur (Tehta O.P.) P.S. Case No. 103 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323. 307, 386, 504 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Petitioner is named in the F.I.R. There is allegation of assault against other co-accused persons.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been alleged against the petitioner. He is in custody for three months. Charge-sheet has been submitted and other co-accused Vicky Kumar and Karu Yadav have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 11.09.2017 and 19.12.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62597 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 34447 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 60195 of 2017 respectively. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in Makhdumpur (Tehta O.P.) P.S. Case No. 103 of 2017, subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(3) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U