Jang Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15322 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2012 Thana -PALANWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Jang Lal Yadav Son of Kamal Yadav Resident of Village Gangapur, P.S. Palanwa District East Champaran.
... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 78 of 2012 registered under Sections 20(B)/22/23/24 of the N.D.P.S. Act, pending in the court of 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Motihari, East Champaran.
Admittedly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected taking into consideration the quantity of the seized Ganja.
The report as called for vide order dated 13.04.2016 has been received from the court of 3rd Addl. Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge N.D.P.S., East Champaran, Motihari vide
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15322 of 2016 (3) dt.04-05-2016 2/2 letter No. 234, dated 19.04.2016 which shows that out of 10 chargesheet witnesses, four witnesses have been examined and remaining witnesses i.e. I.O, Informant and other witnesses are yet to be examined. The Trial Court has expected to conclude the trial within six months.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to reconsider the bail prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is again rejected. However, the learned Court below is directed to take effective stapes to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T