Rambil Ram @ Ranbir Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3827 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2024 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Rambil Ram @ Ranbir Ram Son of Shivbalak Ram Resident of VillageNawabganj, P.S. - Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Budhan Kumar Son of Awadh Ram Resident of Village- Nawabganj, P.S. - Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl. PP Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl. P.P. for the State, Shri Binay Krishna and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2.

This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 20-7-2024 in A.B.P. No. 497 of 2024 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge S.C./S.T. (POA) Act, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 504, 506 of the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3827 of 2024(3) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(1)(r)/3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act.

3.

In the nature of allegation as alleged in the FIR, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant as the informant alleges that the deceased on account of assault died and the appellant was also present at the place of occurrence, further the investigation in the case against the appellant is continuing.

4.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T