Patna High CourtCWJC/7788/2016withdrawn

Sangeeta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7788 of 2016 =========================================================== Sangeeta Kumari, wife of Ahsok Kumar Nirala of village- Murarchak, P.O. Paliganj Sehra, P.S.- Sigori, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Bihar through its Secretary, Computer Bhawan, Government Girls High School, Bankipur, Golghar, Patna

3. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Patna

4. The Block Education Officer, Paliganj, Patna

5. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Mahabalipur, Paliganj, Patna

6. The Headmaster, New Primary School, Mahabalipur Bazar, Paliganj, Patna

7. Sangeeta Kumari, wife of Santosh Kumar of village + P.S. Sigori, DistrictPatna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Namrata Mishra- GA13 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-01-2018 Heard Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the State Appellate Authority, which is now functional.

Permission is accorded.

This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today and, in case, the appeal is

Patna High Court CWJC No.7788 of 2016 dt.19-01-2018 2/2 preferred by the petitioner before the State Appellate Authority within the time frame, the State Appellate Authority will decide the appeal of the petitioner in accordance with law, on its own merit after condoning the delay, if any, filing in appeal, in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the remedy by way of filing writ application.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 23.01.2018 Transmission Date NA