Manish Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66939 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2021 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

MANISH PASWAN SON OF YOGENDRA PASWAN 2.

SAVITA DEVI WIFE OF MANISH PASWAN Both Resident of Village - Harpur Fatikwara, P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

The informant alleges that his daughter was married with Tulsi Paswan six months ago and after marriage the accused persons were demanding a motorcycle and on non-fulfillment of the same his daughter was tortured mentally and physically. The petitioners along with other accused persons used to provoke the husband of the deceased and on 22.02.2021, the informant received information that his daughter has been killed and the dead body has been concealed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66939 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 have been falsely implicated in the present case and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are cousin father-in-law and motherin-law of the deceased and are separated in mess and property with the husband of the deceased and will not have any concern in their day-to-day affair and the husband of the deceased is in custody. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T