Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55687/2022dismissed

Rambhu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-23Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55687 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2022 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rambhu Sah Son of Late Chulahi Sah Resident of Village - Bharthuhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran 2.

Baiju Sah Son of Late Chulahi Sah Resident of Village - Bharthuhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran 3.

Munna Sah Son of Dhanu Sah Resident of Village - Bharthuhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran 4.

Ashok Sah Son of Vishwanath Sah Resident of Village - Bharthuhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran 5.

Suraj Kumar Son of Shambhu Sah Resident of Village - Bharthuhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran 6.

Rakesh Sah Son of Kapildeo Sah Resident of Village - Bharthuhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022 under sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55687 of 2022(2) dt.23-01-2023 2/2 As per the prosecution story, the allegation is that the informant works in the LIC and after collection of Rs. 1,55,212/-, put in the dicky of his motorcycle. Meanwhile, the present petitioners-accused came there and assaulted him, made him unconscious and thereafter took away Rs. 1,55,212/-. Subsequently, the locals came and he was shifted to the hospital. Accordingly, the FIR.

Considering the kind of allegation that has come in the FIR, certainly this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail which is accordingly rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T