← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59123/2025bail rejected

Gaurav Rishidev v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59123 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2021 Thana- ALAMNAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Gaurav Rishidev Son of Chandan Rishidev @ Ramchandra Rishideo Resident of Village - Mankaha, Police Station - Bhatani, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Binita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per F.I.R., on 04.05.2021, this petitioner took son of informant with him, but till night, informant's son did not return and on the next morning, dead-body of informant's son was recovered in Chatra Bahiya. The informant alleges that this petitioner and co-accused Vijay Sada committed murder of his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant is not eye-witness to the occurrence. At best, it is a case of 'last seen'. Petitioner has been made accused merely on suspicion. During investigation, none of the witness has claimed to have seen the petitioner committing the alleged offence. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59123 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 motive has been alleged as to why this petitioner would commit the alleged offence. F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of three days without any plausible explanation of delay.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the fact that it is a case of last seen with the deceased, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T