← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56669/2022allowed

Prabha Kuer v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-19Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56669 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== PRABHA KUER, Wife of Sanjay Pasi, R/V- Malhipur, P.S- Chenari, DistRohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks.

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 89 of 2022 registered for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

As per prosecution case, police received secret information about preparation and selling of illicit liquor by the petitioner. A raid was conducted and recovery of total 30 liters of country made liquor was made from the house of the petitioner. After seeing the police, the petitioner fled away from the spot.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56669 of 2022(2) dt.19-11-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no evidence which proves that the petitioner was involved in preparing and selling the illicit liquor. The petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2022. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is a lady and she was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery has been shown from her and also considering the submission of charge sheet along with period of custody of the petitioner and her clean antecedent, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise-1, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 89 of 2022, subject to the conditions mentioned in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56669 of 2022(2) dt.19-11-2022 3/3 Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Gautam/daya U T