← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14683/2022dismissed

Vijay Shankar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-27Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14683 of 2022 ====================================================== Vijay Shankar S/o- Shukhdeo Prasad Singh R/o- Bharvari, P.S.- Sakar, Dist.- Muzaffarpur, Presently posted as Assistant, Civil Court, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Dept. of Law, Bihar, Patna. 2.

Civil Court, Muzaffarpur, Through In charge- Registrar. 3.

District and Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Registrar In-Charge, Civil Court, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prasant Pratap ( GP- 2 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1.(1) That by this writ application, the petitioner craves indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 2.2.2006 contained in appointment order no.- 04/2006 vide memo no.224-26/E passed by respondent no.-3 whereby and where under the petitioner has been awarded Major penalty of stoppage of two increments of pay for ever and also only subsistence allowance for the suspension period i.e 13.05.2005 to 31.10.2005, who has been working as Assistant, Civil Court, Muzaffarpur since 15.11.1998.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14683 of 2022(2) dt.27-02-2024 2/2 The petitioner prays that for issuance of an appropriate writ in nature of Mandamus commanding and direction the respondent no.-3 to restore his both the stopped increments and also pay his salary of suspension period as abovesaid and pay arrears with all benefit."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner, though seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, however seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other remedies as are otherwise available under the law.

3. It is needless to state that the petitioner is free to avail such other remedies as are permissible and feasible under the law.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U