← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12115/2016bail granted

Suraj Kishor v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12115 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2014 Thana -PAKRIDAYAL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Suraj Kishor Son of Pratap Kishore Singh, resident of village- Chingara Nawasahar, P.S.- Doruwal, District- Nawasahar (Ludhiyana, Punjab) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashraf Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2016 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in Sessions Trial No. 736 of 2014 arising out of Pakarideyal P.S. case No. 59 of 2014 registered under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this court vide order dated 20.04.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8871 of 2015 with a direction to the court below to conclude the trial within six months from the date of receipt of the order. If the trial is not concluded with the stipulated period the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail firstly in the trial court. It is submitted that petitioner has already moved before the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The trial has not yet

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12115 of 2016 (2) dt.17-08-2016 2/2 been concluded and not a single witness has yet been examined. The petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2014. The petitioner has already remained in custody for about two years and four months. It appears that petitioner was apprehended on chase while he was trying to kidnap a girl but he has already remained in jail for about two years and four months. The trial has not yet been concluded and even not a single witness has been examined. Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 736 of 2014 arising out of Pakarideyal P.S. Case No. 59 of 2014. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T