← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16314/2022disposed

Ashok Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16314 of 2022 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Sinha Son of Late Yogendra Prasad Sinha, R/o- Mohalla- North of Government Bus Depo, P.O. and P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui, Bihar811307. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Deputy Secretary, Management Cell, Water Resources Department, Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Joint Secretary, Regional Establishment, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Chief Engineer, Irrigation Creation Bihar Sahrif, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6.

The Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nawada. 7.

The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Shekhpura, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Ranjan, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anjani Kumar (AAG-4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ application has been filed for directing the respondent authorities to grant the difference of post retiral benefits including the arrears and revision of pension in result of grant of 3rd MACP and the consequential benefits attached. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16314 of 2022(2) dt.03-02-2023 2/2 grievances of petitioner, he has made series of representation before respondent no.2 which is annexed as Annexure No.8 series but till date there is no response from his side. In this background, the respondent no.2 is directed to pass a reasoned order within 6 weeks on the representation filed by the petitioner considering all the laws as well as the decisions passed by this Hon'ble Court about which the petitioner shall provide the copy of said orders.

With this direction, the writ application is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U