Sheikh Izahar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.207 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2017 Thana- SIKTA District- West Champaran ======================================================

1. Sheikh Izahar son of Late Sheikh Zahram,

2. Husnara Khatoon, wife of Sheikh Izahar, Both Residents of Village- Jhumka, P.S.- Sikta, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sikta P.S. case no. 121 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in custody. It has been mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

From the written report itself, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.207 of 2018(3) dt.08-02-2018 2/2 petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sikta P.S. case no. 121 of 2017 , they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M.-III, West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T