← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50894/2014rejected

Jyoti Rani v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-30The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50894 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2014 Thana -MADHUBANI TOWN District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Jyoti Rani wife of Mr. Baidyanath Kumar, resident of village- Bhachhi, P.S. Nagar, District Madhubani .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 This is an application, made under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Jyoti Rani, in connection with Madhubani Town Police Station Case No. 10 of 2014 under Sections 406/409/420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the above application and materials on record including a copy of the order, dated 05.11.2014, passed, in A.B.P. No. 727 of 2014, by the learned Sessions Judge, Madhubani, rejecting the said application for pre-arrest bail. Heard Mr. Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Upendra Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State.

The High Court, while exercising its powers under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure, stands on the same

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50894 of 2014 (3) dt.30-04-2015 2/2 footing as does a Sessions Judge inasmuch as a High Court and Sessions Judge have coordinate jurisdiction, while exercising power under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure. Considering incriminating nature of materials against the petitioner, this Court is of the view that in the facts and attending circumstances of the present case, the petitioner has not been able to make out any case calling for giving her benefit of pre-arrest bail.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is hereby rejected. (I. A. Ansari, J) Pawan/- U T