← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20751/2014disposed

Ravi Prakash Singh @ Pappu Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-30Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20751 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Ravi Prakash Singh @ Pappu Singh, Son of Sheo Prasad Singh , Resident of Village- Bhekas, P.S. - Bhabua, District - Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua).

3. Sub- Divisional Officer, Bhabua, District- Kaimur.

4. Circle Officer, Bhabua, District- Kaimur( Bhabua). .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil For the Respondent/s : Mr. PARTHA SARTHY, GA-11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER ORAL (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 30-01-2016 Heard Mr. Kumar Sunil, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Partha Sarthy, learned GA-11, appearing for the Staterespondents. The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to encroachment of public path/public road.

Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned counsel for both the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20751 of 2014 dt.30-01-2016 2/2 parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given by us in the order, dated 24.11.2015, passed in C.W.J.C.No. 4309 of 2015 (Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others), reported in 2016

(1) PLJR 248.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) and respondent No.3, namely, Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhabua, (Kaimur), shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned. In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(I. A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U