Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3200 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3676 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Dinesh Kumar Yadav Son of Late Suresh Yadav Resident of VillageKushahara, Post Office- Nandpur Anwari, Police Station- Andar, DistrictSiwan. At present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Sultanpur, Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan. 2.
Ganesh Ram Son of Late Sharan Das Resident of Village- Kushahara,Post Office- Nandpur (Amwari), Block- Andar, District- Siwan. At Present Posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Pareji, Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan 3.
Ramdahin Ram Son of Late Shyamjit Ram Resident of Village- Sultanpur, Post Office and Police Station- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan, At Present Posted ans working as an Assistant teacher in Govt. Middle School Pachokhar, Anchal- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan 4.
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Son of Shri Nathan Prasad Resident of Village and Post Office- Andar, District- Siwan. At Present Posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Upgraded Girls Middle School Sultanpur, Anchal-Andar, District- Siwan.
5.
Dharm Deo Baitha Son of Late Jagilal Baitha Resident of Village and Post Office- Tiyan, Police Station-Andar, District- Siwan, At Present Posted ans working as as Assistant Teacher in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Pipra, Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan.
6.
Binod Kumar Singh Son of Shri Dinanath Singh Address - Resident of Village and Post Office- Karsar, Police Station- Raghunathpur, DistrictSiwan. At present posted and Working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Girls Middle School Andar, Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan. 7.
Ramesh Kumar Yadav Son of Late Munshi Lal Yadav Resident of VillageMadesilapur West Tola, Post Office and Police Station- Andar, DistrictSiwan. At present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Primary School Belahi (West), Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan. 8.
Arun Kumar Srivastava Son of Shri Nathan Prasad Resident of Village and Post Office- Andar, District- Siwan. At Present Posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Nadiyaw, AnchalRaghunathpur, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar.
2.
Mr. R.K. Mahajan The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Mr. Rahul Singh The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Mr. Vinay Kumar Verma The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5.
Mr. Chandra Shekhar Rai The District Education Officer, Siwan.
Patna High Court MJC No.3200 of 2019(3) dt.07-04-2025 2/3 6.
Mr. Asgar Ali The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan. 7.
Smt. Asha Kumari The Block Education Officer, Andar,District- Siwan. 8.
Smt. Anita Kumari The Block Education Officer, Hussainganj, DistrictSiwan. 9.
Mr. Suryaprakash Srivastava The Block Education officer, Pachrukhi, District- Siwan.
10.
Mrs. Meenu Kumari The Block Education Officer, Raghunathpur, DistrictSiwan. 11.
Mr. Rajesh Prasad Yadav The District Accounts Officer, Siwan. 12.
Mr. Rajesh Prasad Yadav The District Treasury Officer, Siwan. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc 16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2025 This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 09.03.2018 passed in CWJC No. 3676 of 2018, wherein this Court had passed following order:- "...In view of the above, the writ applications are disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan to examine the case of the petitioners in the light of the decision of this Court as indicated hereinabove within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and extend the same benefit to the petitioners, if it is found covered by the decision in L.P.A. in view of the litigation policy of the State Government..."
2. Opposite parties have filed the show-cause wherein
Patna High Court MJC No.3200 of 2019(3) dt.07-04-2025 3/3 in paragraph No. 7 it has been stated as under:- "...7. That in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances the petitioner No. 1 to 6 and 7 have granted benefit in view of the order passed by this Hon'ble court but the claim of petitioner no. 7 has also examined and rejected the same vide memo No. 1381 dated 06.12.2019..."
3. A copy of the order dated 06.12.2019 has also been enclosed as Annexure-B to the show-cause. On perusal of the paragraph No. 7 and the Annexure-B of the show-cause, I find that the examination directed to be made in the writ petition has been complied with by the opposite parties and after examination of the case of the petitioners, vide Annexure-B to the show-cause, the claim of the petitioner No. 7 was rejected, while the claim of the petitioner Nos. 1-6 was allowed.
4. Accordingly, I find that the order dated 09.03.2018 passed in CWJC No. 3676 of 2018 has been complied with by the opposite parties. The contempt application stands closed and disposed off.
(Nani Tagia, J) Nishant/- U