Ravi Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61597 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2014 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Son of Jawahar Bhagat Village- Ram Math (Fakuli), P.S.- Fakuli, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant and his father were on their way to home when they were confronted by four miscreants on two motorcycles. These miscreants collided with the informant's motorcycle and, subsequently, escaped with a bag that contained cash.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and nothing incriminating or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61597 of 2024(2) dt.30-08-2024 2/2 looted articles have been recovered from his possession. The petitioner of the petitioner surfaced during the investigation on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, Randhir Kumar. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 06.05.2024. The petitioner has two criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is also involved in the present case.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence, the Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2014.
7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charges. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T