Ranjan Bind @ Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67497 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2021 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RANJAN BIND @ NIRANJAN KUMAR Son of Paran Vind Resident of Village - Badhouna, P.S.- Kako (Bhelawar O.P.), Distt.- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and has antecedent of two cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that when he came from his dalan to his house, he saw the door of his house opened, articles were scattered and Rs. 50,000/- was missing, further alleges that his wife was lying in a pool of blood who disclosed about the occurrence and identified the petitioner as one of the accused in the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injured at paragraph '26' of the case diary has given a specific
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67497 of 2021(2) dt.20-04-2022 2/2 statement that she was injured on account of assault by khanti made by the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that though it is alleged in the F.I.R. by the informant that his wife was seen in an injured condition and the wife also stated that she was assaulted by the petitioner, but there is no injury report in the case diary and further the statement of the injured was recorded after a delay of eight days. It is further submitted that the co-accused Surendra Yadav has been granted bail vide order dated 03.01.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 34438 of 2021.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kako (Bhelawar) P.S. Case No. 30 of 2021.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T