Sharda Nand Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1486 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Sharda Nand Thakur S/O Sri Maheshwar Thakur R/O MohallaMirzapur, Police Station- Town, District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Road Construction, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The Engineer-In-Chief the Department of Road Construction, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. The Chief Engineer-3, Hajipur Rural Work Department, Bihar, Patna
4. The Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Work Division, Darbhanga
5. The Executive Engineer, Rural Work Division-1 Rural Works Department, Work Division-2 Benipatti, Shivir-Rahika, DistrictMadhubani
6. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra S/O Mithilesh Kumar Mishra R/O VillageKetuka, P.O.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga, At Present Residing At MohallaBenta, P.O. And P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Girija Shankar Pd. GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 07-12-2015 Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner being aggrieved by the allotment of work to the private respondent No.1 has after representing before the respondents, approached this Court inter alia raising an issue that the partnership entered in between the petitioner and the private respondent may not be the basis of allotment of work. Mr. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner however with reference to the statement made by the respondent in paragraph 8
Patna High Court CWJC No.1486 of 2013 (4) dt.07-12-2015 2/2 of the counter affidavit submits that in view of the admission of the respondent that the work was never allotted to the partnership firm rather has been allotted to the private respondent and thus any dispute in between the petitioner and the private respondent can be sorted out by them before the appropriate forum, submits that the petitioner can have no further grievance.
In the circumstances and in view of the submission so made by Mr. Thakur, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U