← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21886/2018dismissed

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21886 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2017 Thana -DELHA District- GAYA ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Mishra, Son of Awadhesh Mishra, Resident of Mohalla- Kharkhura, Bhat Bigha, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Digvijay Narayan Singh, A.P.P. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Delha P.S. Case No. 98 of 2017, G.R. No. 2940 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the deceased.

There is allegation in the written report that this petitioner along with his family members set daughter of the informant on fire, on account of which, she sustained serious burn injury and subsequently, died. It is further alleged that this petitioner and his family members did not inform the informant about her. The informant learnt from his nephew who had gone to Magadh Medical college to meet other patient where he saw the daughter of the informant admitted with serious burn injury. She

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21886 of 2018 (3) dt.14-05-2018 2/2 was unconscious. Thereafter, he informed the informant and then informant brought his daughter to Apolo Burn Hospital, Patna, for better treatment. She regained her sense in Burn Hospital, then she disclosed that this petitioner and his family members set her on fire. It is alleged that daughter of the informant died on account of burn injury.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail which will be considered by the court below in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T