Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20775 of 2014 ====================================================== Anil Kumar son of Late Rameshwar Singh, resident of Village +Post Office- Kajur, Police Station -Atari, Dissrict- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar thorugh the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue , Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector, Gaya.

3. the Circle Officer, Mohra Block ,Gaya

4. Raj Kumar Son of Rameshwar Singh

5. Sunil Kumar Son of Rameshwar Singh

6. Niraj Kumar son of Late Satish Singh

7. Dhiraj Kumar son of Late Satish Singh. Sl. Nos. 4 to 7 are resident of Village + Post Office -Kajur, Police Station- Atari, District - Gaya. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudarshan Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 After some argument, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in presence of the learned AC to AAG-6 appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 3, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the Circle Officer, Mohra Block, in the District of Gaya under Section 3 of The Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011 ( in short 'Act, 2011') by filing a proper petition in a prescribed format, after impleading all the necessary parties including the private respondents herein, for grant of appropriate relief(s) to the petitioner with respect to the lands in question. Permission is accorded.

The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

If an appropriate petition under Section 3 of the Act,

Patna High Court CWJC No.20775 of 2014 (2) dt.22-10-2016 2/2 2011 is filed in the manner indicated above, then the respondent Circle Officer shall be obliged to register a case for mutation of the name of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question and that shall be taken to its logical conclusion in accordance with law, but before passing any final order, reasonable opportunity of hearing must be given to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondent nos. 4 to 7, besides others, if any. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U