Gaurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26211 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -226 Year- 2017 Thana -BAKHTIYARPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Gaurav Kumar, Son of Santosh Kumar @ Dablu Sao, Resident of VillageGovindpur, Police Station- Fatuha, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.28521 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -226 Year- 2017 Thana -BAKHTIYARPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Mantu Kumar Son of Binod Yadav@ Binod Rai Resident of VillageDhanraj Tola, P.S. Khushrupur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.26211 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamla Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh (In Cr.Misc. No.28521 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Samir Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 226 of 2017 registers for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is regarding looting mobiles and other articles from the passengers travelling in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26211 of 2018 (4) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 Train No. 12361 on the point of pistol.
The learned counsel of the aforesaid two cases submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of their confessional statement and in fact they are innocent. It is further submitted that the petitioners are languishing in custody since 05.12.2017.
The learned counsel for both the petitioners submits that the petitioners are ready to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/- (fifty thousand) each in the Nazarat of the court concerned which shall be subject to the result of the case for the purposes of grant of bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioners, above named to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/- each with the Nazarat of the concerned court, subject to the final outcome of the trial, and thereafter produce the receipt of the deposit of the said amount before the concerned court whereafter the concerned court shall grant regular bail to the both petitioners herein on such conditions as it may deem it fit and proper. The petitions are disposed of on the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T