← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17137/2019dismissed

Sweta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17137 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Sweta Kumari, W/o Pankaj Kumar, R/o Village- Maraidih, P.S. Patepur, District Vaishali 2.

Niraj Kumar, son of Harendra Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Maraidih, P.S. Patepur, District Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Vaishali at Hajipur 5.

The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur 6.

The District Program Officer ,Vaishali at Hajipur 7.

The Program Officer (Establishment), Vaishali at Hajipur 8.

The Block Pramukh Jandaha cum-Chairman Block Teacher Employment Unit, Jandaha 9.

The Block Development Officer, Jandaha 10.

The Block Education Officer, Jandaha cum Secretary Block Employment Unit, Jandaha, District-Vaishali 11.

Employment Unit Block Teachers Employment Unit, Jandaha, DistrictVaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar, AC to GP-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2019 The petitioners have filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to consider their case for appointment against the advertisement and selection process made in the year 2008.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17137 of 2019(2) dt.22-08-2019 2/2 We are in 2019 and in terms of the statutory rule, the left over vacancies are taken for subsequent selection process and as such after 11 years, the Court is not inclined to grant any indulgence in the matter.

Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U