Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60223 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2024 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

ROHIT KUMAR S/O Karndev Mahto 2.

Kishundev Mahto @ Krishndev Mahto S/O Late Kuldip Mahto Both are R/O Village- Chauki, P.S- Sahebpur Kamal, Distt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 307, 504 of the IPC in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No.154 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no.2 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 30.05.2024 all the accused persons including the petitioners were plucking fruits from his orchard and were variously armed,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60223 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 2/3 on protest Rohit pushed the informant while Sunil assaulted him by an iron rod, thereafter, Rohit also assaulted the son of the informant by sharp edged weapon, on alarm people gathered when they fled.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are agnates i.e. they belong to the same family and are having dispute relating to land. It is also submitted that the orchard does not belong to the informant solely. It is further submitted that even the injuries suffered by the injured is simple in nature.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Judge,IV, A.C.J.M.-IVth, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No.154 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60223 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 3/3 under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T