← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61489/2023allowed

Suraj Saw @ Suraj Teli v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-22Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61489 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2021 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== Suraj Saw @ Suraj Teli Son Of Late Om Prakash Saw @ Omi Saw @ Umesh Saw Resident Of Village- Pahityaari, Pandarak, Ps- Pandarak, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Krishna Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 149, 307, 336, 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(9) of the Arms Amendment Act, 2019.

3. As per prosecution case, a footage of video is gone viral in which, the petitioner along with others are said to have made air firing after making slogan.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to political rivalry. It is further submitted that no one is said to have sustained injuries in the alleged occurrence. For the alleged occurrence of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61489 of 2023(2) dt.22-09-2023 2/2 26.11.2021, FIR was lodged on 30.11.2021 in delay of four days. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.8.2022.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody period, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 138 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Barh/ concerned Court.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T