Chandrawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55928 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2019 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

CHANDRAWATI DEVI Wife of Ram Chandra Ram Resident of VillageGhora Dehri, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 2.

Sahdeo Ram Son of Late Dhori Ram Resident of Village- Ghora Dehri, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.

3.

Shambhu Ram @ Shambhu Kumar Ram Son of Ram Chandra Ram Resident of Village- Ghora Dehri, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 111/2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. No specific accusation has been attributed against the petitioner. The injuries are simple in nature. It is submitted that specific accusation is against Ram Chandra Ram. Similarly situated co-accused Prince Ram has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 48314 of 2019. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners' be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55928 of 2019(2) dt.03-09-2019 2/2 each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 111/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner no. 1 shall be well represented and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, thier bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T