← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16689/2019disposed

Jay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16689 of 2019 ====================================================== Jay Kumar Son of Rameshwar Sah, Resident of Village- Ramchandrapur, P.O. Jamalpur, P.S. Jamalpur, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director Primary Education Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Jamui.

4.

The District Education Officer, Jamui.

5.

The District Programme Officer, Estalishment(Education), Jamui. 6.

The District Programme Officer, Primary Education, Jamui. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Laxmipur, Jamui. 8.

The Head Master, Primary School, Kushitari, Block- Laxmipur, DistrictJamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar Thakur, AC to GP 27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is aggrieved by inaction on the part of the respondents in the matter of payment of salary for the period from May, 2017 to May, 2018 and July, 2018 till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Shkshak in the year 2010. he is regularly working but he has not been paid salary for the aforesaid period.

The issue of payment of salary requires factual

Patna High Court CWJC No.16689 of 2019(2) dt.19-08-2019 2/2 enquiry as to validity of appointment and actual working for which the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jamui is the competent authority.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jamui to enquiry into the matter and if it is found that appointment of the petitioner is legal and valid and he has actually worked, ensure payment of salary and all consequential benefits to him. Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U