Laxman Sah And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1618 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2001 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Laxman Sah, son of late Chalitra Sah
2. Jailas Devi, wife of Laxman Sah
3. Surendra Sah, son of Laxman Sah All are residents of village-Manikpur, P.S-Minapur, Distt.-Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Kant Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.N.Shukla, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.
The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that Final Report was submitted in the matter, let the Petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 212 of 2001, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1618 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 2/2 to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T