Madhu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 391 of 2015 ====================================================== Madhu Kumari aged about 35 years wife of Akhilesh Ravidas, R/o Vill.- Murarpur, P.O. Kapasiyawa, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda, at presently working as Incharge Head Master Up-Graded Middle School, Murarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Officer, Nalanda

4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda

5. The Block Education Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General - 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

19-01-2017 At the very outset, learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General - 11, in view of facts disclosed in the counter affidavit, submits that writ petition has now become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner was not in a position to dispute the submission made by the learned State counsel. Accordingly, there is no need to keep the matter pending.

The writ petition stands dismissed as same has become infructuous.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U