Janardhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29592 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2018 Thana -HULASGANJ District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Janardhan Yadav, Son of Late Narayan Yadav, Resident of village- Tirra, Police Station- Hulasganj in the district of Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navin Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Ansarul Haque, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 365 and 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the First Information Report the informant has levelled specific allegation against co-accused Amit Kumar @ Bhagatjee of kidnapping his daughter. It is further alleged that the informant went to enquire in the house of Amit Kumar, then petitioner along with other accused persons has misbehaved with him. Petitioner is said to be the father of Amit Kumar @ Bhagatjee. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29592 of 2018 (3) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Rajak, learned Sub Judge-4-cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T