Patna High CourtCWJC/708/2015disposed

Md. Kamrul Haque v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-25Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.708 of 2015 ====================================================== Md. Kamrul Haque , son of Md. Mokin Rien , resident of Village - Gopalpur, P.S. - Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director Magistrate, Sitamarhi,

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi.

6. The Distt. Program Officer (Establishment), Sitamarhi.

7. The Block Education Officer, Block Bokhda, Distt. Sitamahri.

8. The Pramukh, Bhokhda Panchayat Samiti, Block Bhokhda, Distt. - Sitamarhi.

9. The Block Development Officer of Block Bhokhda-Cum-Executive Officer, Bokhda Panchayat Samiti, Block Bokhda, Distt. - Sitamarhi.

10. The Member, Distt. Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Sitamarhi.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Respondent/s : AC to SC - 25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-01-2017 At the very outset, learned AC to SC No. 25 in presence of learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the fact that now the Bihar State Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal has already started functioning, the petitioner may be advised to approach the Bihar State Teachers Employment

Patna High Court CWJC No.708 of 2015 (2) dt.25-01-2017 2/2 Appellate Tribunal since in the present case the petitioner has assailed order of the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority.

In view of the facts and circumstances, there is no reason to keep matter pending.

The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Bihar State Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal.

It goes without saying that period consumed by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. from 12.1.2015 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U