Rohit Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67247 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2021 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Rohit Ray Son Of Gyani Mandal Resident Of Village - Semapur, P.S.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar, At Present R/O Buddhuchak, P.S.- Sahayak, Distt.- Katihar.

2.

Sangeeta Devi W/O Mukesh Mandal @ Mukesh Ray Resident Of Village - Semapur, P.S.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar, At Present R/O Buddhuchak, P.S.- Sahayak, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners, after some argument, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application against petitioner no.1.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn against the petitioner no.1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner no.2 seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 341, 354(A), 504, 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67247 of 2021(3) dt.21-07-2022 2/2 further submitted that the victim has returned and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and from perusal of the same, it would manifest that she has not even remotely suggested about the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. after going through the case diary very fairly submits that the victim has not stated anything about the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner no.2, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Katihar (S) P. S. Case No.141 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T