Ravindra @ Deepak Rawani @ Deepak Ramani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28533 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2018 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== Ravindra @ Deepak Rawani @ Deepak Ramani S/o late Dhupan Rawani Resident of Village- Barh Paraiya, P.S. Paraiya, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No.33 of 2018 registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
Allegation in brief is that the petitioner was apprehended with several other miscreants while making plan of dacoity and there is recovery of a country made pistol with two live cartridges from his possession and the petitioner bears a number of criminal antecedents precisely eight in number as mentioned by the petitioner including the cases of robbery, dacoity and kidnapping.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28533 of 2018(3) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 police apprehended the petitioner on 25.01.2018 and case was instituted on 28.01.2018. The fact is not supported by the FIR or seizure list rather it is contrary to the said submission. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.01.2018 and for recovery of the arms, a separate case was instituted in which he has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances especially large number of criminal antecedents of the petitioner of serious nature, presently the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected.
However, the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail after framing of charge.
(Arun Kumar, J) S.KUMAR/- U T