← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57450/2022allowed

Jamila Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57450 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- SIKTA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Jamila Khatoon Wife Of Sheikh Faud Resident Of Village - Lal Parsa, P.S.- Sikta, District - West Champaran.

2.

Anjum Ara Wife Of Pravez Alam Resident Of Village - Lal Parsa, P.S.- Sikta, District - West Champaran.

3.

Afrida Khatoon Daughter Of Sheikh Faud Resident Of Village - Lal Parsa, P.S.- Sikta, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, if any, within three weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 465, 468, 467, 471, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are bonafide purchaser of the land in question and have already paid the full and final consideration money whereas petitioner no. 3 is the identifier. He submits that the co-accused Shagufta

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57450 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023 2/2 Praveen is the vendor of the land in question and wife of informant's son. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that the dispute is purely civil in nature. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sikta P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T