Avinash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13591 of 2023 ====================================================== Avinash Kumar Son of Sri Randhir Kumar Resident of Village and P.O.- Badarwali, P.s.-Chandi, District-Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Animal Husbandry and fishery Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Additional Chief Secretary General Administration Department Governmsnt of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director Fishery Directorate Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Chairman, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19 Harding Road, Patna.
5.
The Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19 Harding Road, Patna.
6.
The Deputy Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19 Harding Road, Patna.
7.
The Office of the Civil Surgeon-Cum-CMB 8.
Ram Babu Kumar Son of Jay Ram Pandit Resident of Village-Bankul, Hirauta Duma, Tariani Chowk, District-Sheohar. 9.
Santosh Kumar Son of Jiwanch Mandal Resident of Village-Sarhila P.O.- Baraj, P.S.-Hathauri, District-Samastipur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Harsh Vardhan, Advocate Mr.Shatabdi Sinha, Advocate Mr.Amresh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag12) Mr.Ebadur Rahman Shakeb, AC to AAG-12 For BTSC :
Mr.Nikesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-03-2024
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For commanding the Respondents to inquire into the document submitted by the Respondent no. 8 and if found forged and fabricated then take necessary steps to
Patna High Court CWJC No.13591 of 2023(2) dt.11-03-2024 2/2 appoint the petitioner on the post of Matasaya Vikas Padadhikari.
(ii) For Commanding the respondents to verify the disability of respondent no. 8 by conducting medical examination of respondent no. 8."
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U