Jai Ram Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4659 of 2014 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1120 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Jai Ram Singh Son of Late Govind Singh Resident of Gosaibag, Singh Niwas, Station Road, P.S. - Kotwali, Distt. - Gaya.

2. Indra Pal Singh Son of Late Sita Ram Singh Resident of LIG - 07, H.B. Colony, Near Asha Singh More, P.S. - Rampur, Distt. Gaya.

3. Narmadeshwar Pandey Son of Late Krishna Deo Pandey Resident of Sita Ram Bhawan, Nutan Nagar, P.S. - Civil Lines, Distt. - Gaya.

4. Dr. Ram Krit Yadav Son of Shri Preman Yadav Resident of Village - Ghorwadih, P.S. - Sherghati (Dobhi), Distt. - Gaya.

5. Ramashish Kumar Singh Son of Late Ganesh Singh, Resident of Village - Nawada, P.S. - Gurua, Distt. - Gaya.

6. Raghubansh Kumar Singh Son of Late Janakdeo Singh, Resident of Village - Pipraura, P.S. - Madanpur, Distt. - Aurangabad.

7. Dhirendra Singh Son of Late Mundrika N. Singh, Resident of Village - Palakia, P.S. - Sherghati, Distt. - Gaya.

8. Binod Kumar, Son of Late Kamla Singh, Resident of At - Mohanpur, P.S. - Sherghati, Distt. - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Shri R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Dr. Ishtiyaque Ahmad, Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

3. Dr. D.K. Yadav, Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG-14 For the Magadh University : Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 In view of the statements made in the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 a copy of which has been served on the learned counsel for the petitioners as back as on 22.02.2018 and has remained uncontroverted, this Court is not

Patna High Court MJC No.4659 of 2014 (10) dt.02-11-2018 2/2 willing to proceed with the contempt application. A prayer for time in the case has been made, but considering the fact that this is a case of the year, 2014, there is an affidavit showing compliance and the same has not been controverted despite a lapse of 8 months by now, this Court is not willing to grant any adjournment. The same is refused. Learned counsel for the State is present and has filed a show cause. Let it be kept on record.

The application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/Ved/- U