Abash Ansari @ Abbas Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40400 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2016 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== ABASH ANSARI @ ABBAS ANSARI S/o Allauddin Ansari @ Allauddin Miya, R/o Vill.- Karariya Thakurai, P.S.- Phulwariya, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhramveer For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Sufiyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application for regular bail in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 75 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that while he was returning to his office after withdrawing an amount of Rs. 2,65,000/- on his motorcycle and money was kept in the dicky, four unknown miscreants on Bolero stopped him and thereafter looted the motorcycle as well as money kept in the motorcycle, one mobile and some other documents and fled away. Name of petitioner has surfaced in this case on basis of confessional statement made by co-accused as well as his own confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He is in custody since 27.09.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40400 of 2018(3) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let above name petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 75 of 2016 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/manoj U T