Chandan Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3382 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2014 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Chandan Sah son of Gorakh Sah
2. Gorakh Sah son of late Yogendra Sah
3. Sunny Kumar son of Gorakh Sah
4. Kanchan Devi wife of Gorakh Sah
5. Anita Kumari daughter of Gorakh Sah
6. Deepu Kumari daughter of Gorakh Sah, all residents of village Oriental Club Kali Sthan Gali, Police Station Kaji Mohammadpur, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhakar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 27-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the developments that had taken place in the case, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Sadar P.S. case No.146 of 2014 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3382 of 2015 (2) dt.27-01-2015 2/2 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.
The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.