Patna High CourtCWJC/1437/2015disposed

Sangita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-03Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1437 of 2015 ====================================================== Sangita Kumari wife of Arbind Paswan resident of village- Ismailpur, P.SSahpur Patori, district- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar Patna.

3. The Director Samekit Child Development Services(CIDS) ( Society Welfare Department ) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Samastipur, District-Samastipur.

5. The Sadar Divisional Officer, Patori, District- Samastipur.

6. The Child Development Program Officer, Patori, District- Samastipur.

7. The District Program Officer(ICDS) Samastipur, Dist- Samastipur.

8. The Block Development Officer, Patori Block, District- Samastipur.

9. The Mukhiya, Immansarai Gram Panchayat, Block- Patori, DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : AC to AAG - 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-02-2017 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned AC to AAG No. 10 by way of referring to the statement made in paragraph no. 17 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1 to 8 on 16th August 2016 submits that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. She submits that in the writ petition the petitioner has only prayed for directing the respondents to fix the date of Aam Sabha for selection of Anganwari Sevika / Sahaika whereas as per statement made in

Patna High Court CWJC No.1437 of 2015 (2) dt.03-02-2017 2/2 paragraph no. 17 the petitioner has already been selected as Sewika after the decision of Aam Sabha.

In view of the fact stated in the counter affidavit it is evident that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and as such there is no need to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U