Madhukar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54911 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Madhukar Yadav S/O Ramsundar Yadav Resident Of Village-Bhandariya, Ward No.- 08, P.S.- Jamalpur, Dist.- Darbhanga 2.

Sumindra Kumar Yadav @ Sumindar Kumar Yadav S/O Jivach Yadav @ Jivachh Yadav Resident Of Village-Bhandariya, Ward No.- 08, P.S.- Jamalpur, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per allegation, in course of checking the vehicles, two persons were seen alongwith a big bag kept on the motorcycle. It is further alleged that seeing the police party, both the persons started fleeing away but they were apprehended and a big bag containing contraband in huge amount, like Wiscodim Cough Syrup, Codiwell Cough Syrup, Codiscan-T Cough Syrup, and different types of prohibited

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54911 of 2025(7) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 capsules were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from their possession. The petitioners are in custody since 10-05-2025.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. It appears that narcotic substance recovered from possession of the petitioners is in commercial quantity. They have one criminal antecedent of Section-30(a) of Bihar Excise & Prohibition Act in their credit.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners do not deserve the privilege of bail and accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T