Pranav Ranjan @ Saurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14967 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2017 Thana -VISHNUPAD District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Pranav Ranjan @ Saurav Kumar, S/o Nagendra Singh @ Narendra Kumar Singh, R/o Mohalla- Chand Chaurah, Near Ram Nagar Talab, P.S.- Vishnupad, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 22-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Vishnupad P.S. Case No.163 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 354, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a student of MBA at PSIJ, College, Kanpur. He has no criminal antecedents. The informant has left her husband and she has 2-3 children. The petitioner has annexed Annxure-2, which shows that some complaints were also made with regard to activities of the informant in the locality.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation that this petitioner misbehaved with her when she had gone to purchase noodles.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14967 of 2018 (3) dt.22-06-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No.163 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.