← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6275/2016disposed

Shashi Bhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-12-23Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6275 of 2016 =========================================================== Shashi Bhushan Singh, Son of Sadhu Saran Singh, resident of Village- Sherahwar, P.S.- Shikarpur, district West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Secretary, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan Patna.

3. District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah.

4. District Education Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah.

5. District Programme Officer, (Establishment), West Champaran Bettiah.

6. Block Education Officer, Narkatiyaganj, District- West Champaran.

7. Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Serahwa, Block- Narkatiyaganj.

8. In-charge Headmaster, Rajkiya Prathmik Vidyalaya, Sherahwa Dhakwa, BlockNarkatiyaganj, District- west Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhu Nath Sharma, A.C. to A.G. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-12-2016 Heard Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prabhu Nath Sharma, A.C. to A.G. for the State. Though the petitioner has questioned the order of suspension dated 22.1.2016 passed by the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Serahwa in the Block-Narkatiyaganj in the district of West Chamapran but it is submitted by Mr. Sharma learned State counsel that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to question the same under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Appointment and Service Condition) Rules,2006 (hereinafter referred

Patna High Court CWJC No.6275 of 2016 dt.23-12-2016 2/2 to as 'the Rules') as amended from time to time. Rule 18 of 'the Rules' in question does provide an appellate forum for the Panchayat teachers to raise any grievance relating to appointment and service condition. Obviously, the order of suspension is a grievance arising out of the appointment and service conditions of a Panchayat teacher and thus the petitioner would be well advised to exhaust the remedy so available to him.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Considering that it is an order of suspension any such application filed by the petitioner should be considered and disposed of by the appellate authority expeditiously with a sense of priority. (Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 23.12.16 Transmission Date